Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
- Subject: Re: Media Testing for maclife.de
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:52:17 +0100
On 14 Sep 2008, at 17:45, Andrew Rodney wrote:
We should thank Eric and Eric and Chris for being so patient with
you in terms of providing you the baby steps in seeing how you've
failed to grasp the weakness of your conclusions about camera
profiles.
All together now: "Er-ic, Er-ic, so good you named him twice".
Yeah I'll thank them -- because when Andrew says "we" he knows he
speaks for all of us!
I was especially thankful that Chris Cox began his patient "baby
steps" with this opening paragraph:
"Ule has been completely unprofessional in his review and on
this mailing list. He has shown a very strong bias, failed
to check his facts, failed to match results made by other
reviewers (then claim that those results are not possible),
made several statements that were blatantly false, and
produced a "review" that appears to have no value due to his
constant mistakes."
I'm just glad I got my proofing system doing deep, rich browns
accurately. If I'm ever called on to proof a portrait of the digital
dawg your Adobe Certified nose is going to be FOGRA certified too!
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden