Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: VIGC study on spectrophotometers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VIGC study on spectrophotometers

Subject: Re: VIGC study on spectrophotometers
From: Mike Eddington <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:38:12 -0400

>Follow this link to an interesting piece on spectros and accuracy, all a little scary, from VIGC the Flemish Innovation Centre for Graphic Arts.>

Scary enough, for real world devices measuring a common Netprofiler test chart. Now throw in real world inks/toners and substrates (with varying levels of optical brighteners) and look at the differences. Tell me how our industry can define any meaningful verification tolerances without taking into consideration a tolerance for the instrument itself?

And when will Netprofiler broaden its instrument support?


Michael Eddington
QA Manager/G7 Certified Expert
North American Color, Inc.
www.nac-mi.com
www.nac1to1.com
www.photo360.com

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: VIGC study on spectrophotometers
From: Terence Wyse <email@hidden>


Prev by Date:
Re: [Icc_users] Matrix profile with negative "Red colorant	tristimulus"

Next by Date:
Re: VIGC study on spectrophotometers

Previous by thread:
Re: VIGC study on spectrophotometers

Next by thread:
Re: VIGC study on spectrophotometers

Index(es):

Date
Thread