Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: HP Dreamcolor Display: So far, so good.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HP Dreamcolor Display: So far, so good.

Subject: Re: HP Dreamcolor Display: So far, so good.
From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:29:02 -0600


On Sep 28, 2008, at 10:26 PM, Marco Ugolini wrote:

Also, I remember hearing something from Bruce Fraser years ago about why a "tuned" colorimeter is better at monitor profiling than a spectrophotometer. I wish I had a better memory of the reasons why that is so. Can anyone help?


Yes:

http://www.lumita.com/site_media/work/whitepapers/files/xrite-wp-3a.pdf

Andrew Rodney http://www.digitaldog.net/ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden References: >Re: HP Dreamcolor Display: So far, so good. (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>) Prev by Date: Re: HP Dreamcolor Display: So far, so good. Next by Date: Colorimeter vs. spectrophotometer in display profiling Previous by thread: Re: HP Dreamcolor Display: So far, so good. Next by thread: Re: HP Dreamcolor Display: So far, so good. Index(es): Date Thread