Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 340

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 340

Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 340
From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:56:23 +1000

edmund ronald wrote:

exist anymore.,  The same problem hits digital cameras, and is the
main reason why the race to more pixels is not a good idea, and  a
strong contributor to the fact pixel size has a lower limit at each
point in time.


And if you downsample the image, what happens to the S/N ?

Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 340 (From: email@hidden)
  >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 340 (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 340 (From: "edmund ronald" <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 340

Next by Date:
Re: Colorimeter vs. spectrophotometer in display profiling

Previous by thread:
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 340

Next by thread:
Spectro vs. Colorimeter

Index(es):

Date
Thread