• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: Correlating Tappi Brightness
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Correlating Tappi Brightness


  • Subject: RE: Correlating Tappi Brightness
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:30:07 -0400 (EDT)

Roger wrote:

>Mike,
>
>I've always wondered the same thing, wouldn't it be convenient to go from
>Lab to Tappi brightness and vice-versa. But, I was told that, on top of
>measuring reflectance at 452nm, Tappi uses an illuminant C type of light
>source, unlike the tungsten light source used in an EyeOnePro, for instance.
>Personally, I never tried to relate the two measurements mathematically, in
>Excel, for instance. I live with 72 Brightness corresponding to L89 for
>SWOP5 and 88 Brightness corresponding to L92 SWOP3. I know, far from
>perfect.

I would think that there must be a way that *they* determine their brightness values. I have no idea how it's done, but, if you find out how they do it, from there there may or not be a way to correlate that metric to L* or Y measurements.

Marco
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: Correlating Tappi Brightness
      • From: Roger <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: RE: Correlating Tappi Brightness
  • Next by Date: RE: Correlating Tappi Brightness
  • Previous by thread: RE: Correlating Tappi Brightness
  • Next by thread: RE: Correlating Tappi Brightness
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread