• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Laminate profile - Abstract profile?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Laminate profile - Abstract profile?


  • Subject: Re: Laminate profile - Abstract profile?
  • From: Hanno Hoffstadt <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 17:40:00 +0200

Hallo Roger,

thanks for the suggestions, you probably guessed that we discussed this already internally... I'd also like to see an "add lamination effect" checkbox, with a choice of matte and glossy, plus a slider for the lpi or FM dot size... but that's up to product management. (Opinions stated are my own, of course - the usual disclaimer)

Technically, this could be done provided that we have access to the unlaminated characterization data, or "aim values" in GMG lingo; this is not always the case depending on how an MX4 or spot color has been created.

Compared to just using suitable (predicted or measured) characterization data, as you can do today, this would also affect spot colors - a major advantage. On the other hand, it is not exactly straightforward how to deal with manual corrections. And the inkjet CMYK values (as displayed in the profile editor or in the spot editor) wouldn't be valid anymore, since the laminate correction would come on top of that. (Now ask the friendly support guys what they'd think about explaining all that.)

Generally, when proofing for the final product (post-lam), it is also very important to choose a substrate with a similar surface. In the ECI working group, we found that the GMG glossy paper 250 is convincing for glossy varnish or lamination. GMG semimatte 250 is acceptable for matte lamination, but not optimal. In fact, we haven't found any proofing paper or cheap lamination method (PE, PVC, 80 microns or thicker) or varnish spray that comes anywhere close to the "premium" look of a thin (~12 microns) OPP matte lamination.

Therefore, for best results you'd need to laminate your proof (and create an appropriate gamut or ICC proofer profile for the laminated proof). This was also found to be very convincing, but too cumbersome for daily production.

Hanno

Am 08.08.2009 um 16:57 schrieb Roger:

Hallo Hanno,

Would it be possible, technically, to incorporate your laminate corrections,
even if not completely "proven" or tested into Colorproof 05? Somehow? Or
Flexoproof 05? Or as some "plug-in" or adjunct of Colorproof?


And then, perhaps, there could be some user-controlled "sliders" for the
most important dimension or parameters of the correction?


Best / Roger


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: Laminate profile - Abstract profile?
      • From: Roger <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Laminate profile - Abstract profile? (From: Hanno Hoffstadt <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Laminate profile - Abstract profile? (From: Roger <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Delta H Comparison
  • Next by Date: RE: Laminate profile - Abstract profile?
  • Previous by thread: RE: Laminate profile - Abstract profile?
  • Next by thread: RE: Laminate profile - Abstract profile?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread