Re: relative colorimetric without black point compensation
Re: relative colorimetric without black point compensation
- Subject: Re: relative colorimetric without black point compensation
- From: "john castronovo" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:31:51 -0500
Based on my personal practical experience, I'm in agreement with you
Marco and of course Don H as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marco Ugolini"
Just as a long-time user with my share of practical experience built
over
the years -- and not as a scientist -- Relative Colorimetric *without*
BPC
does not make practical sense to me in the overwhelming majority of
instances.
If I am converting an image from an RGB space (AdobeRGB or
ProPhotoRGB) and
I notice some visible clipping, then I may resort to the Perceptual
intent.
Otherwise my preferred intent is RelCol *with* BPC. I have not
encountered
any instances in which it made sense, esthetically or otherwise, to
blunt
the dynamic range of the converted image by generating blacks and
shadows
that look too light, as they are likely to appear without BPC.
The examples that Don Hutcheson mentions in his message are very
legitimate
and reasonable, but they occur very rarely, for many users possibly
never.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden