Re: ColorMunki?
Re: ColorMunki?
- Subject: Re: ColorMunki?
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:57:23 -0800
- Thread-topic: ColorMunki?
In a message dated 1/29/09 5:30 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:
> The basic spectrometer module seems very similar in construction
> to that of the i1iSis, although some of the details may be
> different (Number of White LEDs, no UV LED).
> The ColorMunki wavelength range appears to be a bit more
> limited than the i1pro, with a reflective mode range of 430 - 730
You say this based on direct observation/testing?
I don't have a ColorMunki myself, but if you do, could you please pass on to
me a copy of one of its CXF measurement files? I'd like to take a look.
> (the 380 - 420 readings being copies of the 430),
> and slightly better in emissive mode, 400-730 (380 & 390
> being copies of 400nm). This limit for reflective is probably
> partly because there isn't enough illumination at those wavelengths
Is there only one LED light source in the ColorMunki, as far as you know?
> It does seem a little cumbersome reading patch strips compared to the
> i1pro, and this is reflected in size and number of patches the software
> places on each sheet.
I was able to look at a ColorMunki close up at MacWorld, and the opening
appears small enough to be able to read patches the size of those used for
the i1Pro.
Currently, it reads patches that are very large because it's meant to be
operated without a ruler by relatively inexperienced users.
But perhaps a ruler could be developed for it, which would make it possible
to fit many more patches on a page. This is, of course, if the ColorMunki
ever ends up being supported by higher-end profiling software.
Marco Ugolini
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden