Re: Color difference equations
Re: Color difference equations
- Subject: Re: Color difference equations
- From: Mike Eddington <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:29:10 -0400
- Thread-topic: Color difference equations
>It is undisputed that there are situations where more physical measures are
appropriate (i.e. when we want to spot the /sources/ of errors), but when we are
interested in the /effects/ of deviations to our perception, we should use the
measure that correlates with our perception at best -- and that's CIEDE00 (at
least for small color differences).>
I see the ³best for small color differences² recommendation for dE2000 quite
a bit, and I suppose I have no reason to dispute that dE2000 operates better
for smaller variations than large, and I¹ve always gone along with it.
Actually though, in practice, I haven¹t found dE2000 to be profoundly
misleading for larger color differences either. And again, should I be
worried about whether that blatantly obvious color difference between two
samples is accurately calculated with a dE2000 of 10, when dE76 shows it as
31 (actually measurements)? I think I¹m becoming increasingly cynical and
polarized on the issue. ;)
Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden