• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: CG210 vs CG211
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CG210 vs CG211


  • Subject: Re: CG210 vs CG211
  • From: "Fleisher, Ken" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:17:47 -0400
  • Thread-topic: CG210 vs CG211

Okay, thanks Vanita and Roger. This is what I expected and I appreciate the
input.

Ken


On 6/15/09 9:07 AM, "Vanita Cyril" <email@hidden> wrote:

> Hey Ken,
> In our retouching studio we have 10 Eizo CGs. I switched from a CG210 to a 211
> about 18 months ago. The rest of the Eizos are 210s. I haven't seen any
> difference between our monitors. Supposedly the 16 bit processing makes this
> huge difference in shadow detail, but i haven't seen it.
> Vanita
>
> Vanita Cyril
>
> color manager
> shootdigital
email@hidden
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: CG210 vs CG211 (From: Vanita Cyril <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: CG210 vs CG211
  • Next by Date: Re: CG210 vs CG211
  • Previous by thread: Re: CG210 vs CG211
  • Next by thread: Re: CG210 vs CG211
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread