RE: i1 UV
RE: i1 UV
- Subject: RE: i1 UV
- From: Roger <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:12:06 -0400
David,
I don't think that everyone agrees a "good" colorimeter is superior for
monitor calibration. Everyone's experience seems at variance with one
another from all the posts I've ever read on this List over the last few
years. I, for one, like the EyeOnePro better. But I'll admit, it has its
known limitations, which can largely be worked around. The DTP94 has its
suite of followers, and for good reasons. So I say, take your pick.
Roger
> It is the consensus opinion that a good colorimeter is superior for
> monitor calibration? We do have a DTP94 and I usually use it for
> monitor calibration but I have used the i1 as well. I'll likely be
> getting the UV i1 and will post my findings on any differences.
>
> I've though of another point, on the emissive end, what about a light
> source reading taken from flash? Our heads are UV filtered. Perhaps
> this will show how well.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: i1 UV
- From: José Ángel Bueno García <email@hidden>
| References: | |
| | >i1 UV (From: David Remington <email@hidden>) |