Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- Subject: Re: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 15:54:51 -0700
- Thread-topic: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
In a message dated 4/4/10 1:58 PM, Martin Orpen wrote:
> On 4 Apr 2010, at 19:04, Marco Ugolini wrote:
>
>> This thread is not about Adobe: it's about establishing whether or not the
>> forum agrees that an overhaul of ColorSync along the lines I indicated would
>> be in order.
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> I haven't laughed so much since the thread where you *established* that gamut
> mapped, perceptual intent, device linked RGB to CMYK conversions were a waste
> of time.
Yes, I concur that that thread occurred...in your imagination, which is
provably perfervid.
> I also heard that FOGRA had asked if they could use the "bloody axe" image on
> their certification test page...
Really? Well, then thank you so much for that bit of life-changing news.
What would we do without you here at the ColorSync forum?
Marco
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden