The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- Subject: The need for a substantial upgrade of ColorSync
- From: Michael Papet <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Steve Upton: There's lots that could be done at Apple. CMS is not a top-line money-maker that also has licensing costs. With two strikes against it and no visibility beyond a *small* print customer group, it languishes.
Nathan's comments reflect my limited experience with Apple.
>ColorSync is old. Really old.
>We got some extremely minor updates that the Aperture team's PM
>demanded out
>of concern for his less-than-stellar sales figures
>... big, gaping holes in the functionality of
the library/framework. Some things just don't work at all, and others are
flat out impossible.
Which is why I've largely given up on this platform and switched to Linux.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden