Re: Soft-Proofing Workflow
Re: Soft-Proofing Workflow
- Subject: Re: Soft-Proofing Workflow
- From: Ken Fleisher <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:50:26 -0400
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Steve Upton <email@hidden> wrote:
> The difficulty of your situation is likely due to the absurdity of it.
>
LOL. How true.
I love your ruler analogy. It brings back memories of Stonehenge and "This
is Spinal Tap". :-b
> When working in larger & government institutions I strongly recommend
> moving the print procurement programs over to standards-based reproduction.
> You then have the ability to set the standards, hold vendor's feet to the
> fire, and streamline the production process. I realize that from your
> perspective that might be like pushing a rope but if the higher-ups can see
> the irony and waste in a well color-managed groups efforts being stripped
> off as work leaves your office, perhaps they'll see the light.
>
We've tried to get our publishing department to agree to only use printers
who comply to an ICC workflow, but they just won't, even though they have
seen first hand how such printers often get a final proof on the first try.
> Either way, we're pulling for you.
>
Thanks!
Ken
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden