Re: fine art reproduction questions
Re: fine art reproduction questions
- Subject: Re: fine art reproduction questions
- From: neil snape <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 18:55:17 +0200
- Thread-topic: fine art reproduction questions
on 1/05/10 18:13, Roger Breton wrote :
> You lecture above on "how to" deal with high dynamic range but you avoid
> responding directly to Ben's point? I'd like to see what you have to say
> about Ben's contention that there is very little dynamic range in art in the
> first place?
Roger I don't lecture anyone, unlike you.
If you want to find out more about HDR , then go ahead there are lots of
sources,
If you don't know a thing about the DR of a DSLR then you had better take a
look around.
If you think there is all of the info in the art work you are capturing ,
which can happen fine for you.
So if you really want to know , I just said that a 500mm is not ideal for
copy work. If you don't want to believe me, fine. You could get a Kodak book
on copy work or work for galleries and find out what repro work is about, I
don't care.
Who the hell are you to respond to this type of post.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden