Re: fine art reproduction questions
Re: fine art reproduction questions
- Subject: Re: fine art reproduction questions
- From: Stefan Ohlsson <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 19:50:12 +0200
When we compare the color and sharpness that we get from a MF digital back, using a multi shot system, it is without a doubt better than the 4 x 5 chromes that we sometimes get.
As for museums not using MF digital backs, I don't know. There are some pretty well-known museums that are. http://www.hasselblad.com/user-showcase/the-multi-shot--the-museum.aspx
Stefan
1 maj 2010 kl. 19.33 skrev Mike Strickler:
> You can print whatever size you like regardless the capture method, and the buyer must decide whether it is sharp enough for his purposes. Museums do not generally consider MF digital backs to be adequate for high-fideity reproduction of their paintings, any more than they used MF film for this particular purpose (though they used it for other things). I can tell you that my customers always found my prints from LF capture noticeably more detailed than those done by an MF back at another studio. You may not be so critical, and that's OK.
Projektor Utbildning AB
Hornsgatan 103, 12 tr
117 28 Stockholm
www.profiler.nu
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden