Re: fine art reproduction questions
Re: fine art reproduction questions
- Subject: Re: fine art reproduction questions
- From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 09:56:37 -0700
On 2010 May 2, at 9:39 AM, Andrew Rodney wrote:
> On May 2, 2010, at 8:08 AM, neil snape wrote:
>
>> What you are not understanding is the development from raw is to make a
>> image look like your eye sees the images, not trying to reproduce the scene
>> values.
>
> Exactly! The ICC has a white paper on the subject that covers this idea:
>
> http://www.color.org/ICC_white_paper_20_Digital_photography_color_management_basics.pdf
>
> (remember that one Ben?)
Andrew, remember the analogy I made about how Neil was like a race car driver suggesting one should use a Ferrari to tow a boat to the mountain lake? By posting that link, you're acting more like the kid with toy rockets suggesting that, if we can't get NASA to loan us the Shuttle (and wouldn't *that* be neat?), maybe we could tow the boat with our tricycles if we pedaled hard enough.
I mean, seriously? In a discussion that includes people posting links to cutting-edge research into spectral imaging at RIT, you post a link to *THAT*? What on Earth are you thinking?
Cheers,
b& _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden