• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?]


  • Subject: Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?]
  • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 18:14:03 +1000

Ernst Dinkla wrote:
substantially hidden from view. I find that a very optimistic statement. With transmissive screens they may get away with that but in reflective screens it doesn't work that way. It would be worse with a CMY+K reflective screen.

Don't you mean the other way around ? With transmissive screens there is nowhere to hide the reservoir, since light has to be transmitted though it. The multiple surfaces of the reservoir also creates extra boundaries for light reflection/dispersion. For a reflective display, the reservoir can be hidden behind the reflective surface. The limit is then the hole size, not the reservoir size. This works best for monochrome though - doing multiple layers still seems a very difficult prospect.

Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?]
      • From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>
References: 
 >RE: CMY Display coming? (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)
 >A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?] (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)
 >RE: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?] (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?] (From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?]
  • Next by Date: Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?]
  • Previous by thread: Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?]
  • Next by thread: Re: A metameric match between display and print? [was: CMY Display coming?]
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread