• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish?


  • Subject: Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish?
  • From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 09:33:48 -0700

At 5:29 PM -0700 5/17/11, Tyler Boley wrote:
> Anyone have strange behavior in Colorthink displaying curves, black point, or nonsensical 3d gamut shapes?

That would be an incompatibility between the new profiles from i1Profiler (ICC v4 but strangely not all of them) and the LCMS CMM version that's in the current ColorThink. We'll have an update soon that corrects the problem.

Also, i1Profiler introduces *yet another* CGATS file format issue where the spectral values may not read properly into ColorThink. It is easy to blame X-Rite on this one but I must point to the CGATS file spec's ambiguity... One of these days we'll get to the bottom of all the interpretations of that seemingly simple file format.... yes XML is a solution, but it's bulky and I don't know a single person who can open a text editor and build a CXF file wrapper around a handful of color values. I know quite a few fellow color geeks who can do that with the CGATS format. Badge of honor? no, but handy nonetheless.

> Anyone find discrepancies between Colorthink reported gamut volumes and Monaco Gamutworks reported gamut volumes?

If you see large differences (on the order of GamutWorks being about 2.5 times the size of ColorThink's) then it's due to a bug in Gamutworks that, I think, was fixed in later versions. If the difference is smaller then it is likely due to something else. I've found the differences to be with a reasonable error limit before. If you see strangeness, please send me the profile and particulars offline and we'll take a look.

>Anyone using CMYKOG at all, and finding the O and G separation user settings working at all? Anyone getting Photoshop to recognize CMYK+ profiles in the advanced "convert to" dialogue? Anyone finding optimal chart sizes for both 1st and optimized builds, given the assumption there will be an optimization?

I hear your pain and agree that you are likely on the bleeding edge of the testing group. Not that the features aren't valuable or that they shouldn't work, just that the testing of lesser-used features is sometimes..... sparse..


Regards,

Steve


________________________________________________________________________
o  Steve Upton              CHROMiX        www.chromix.com
o   (hueman)                               866.CHROMiX
________________________________________________________________________
--

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (From: "Millers' Photography L.L.C." <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (From: edmund ronald <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (From: edmund ronald <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (From: Tyler Boley <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish?
  • Next by Date: RE: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish? (Lou Dina)
  • Previous by thread: RE: Some comments from inside Xrite.
  • Next by thread: Any comments or feedback on i!Publish?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread