RE: ISO 12647-7 and i1Profiler (i1Publish) Printer QA
RE: ISO 12647-7 and i1Profiler (i1Publish) Printer QA
- Subject: RE: ISO 12647-7 and i1Profiler (i1Publish) Printer QA
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:51:23 -0400
Hi Dan,
In my copy of ISO_12647-2_2004_Amd_1_2007, Table 3 on page 5, contribution
of the hue difference shall not exceed 2.5.
Is that what you're referring to?
Best / Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden
[mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden] On
Behalf Of Dan Reid
Sent: October-04-11 3:11 PM
To: email@hidden
Subject: ISO 12647-7 and i1Profiler (i1Publish) Printer QA
Hey folks,
Does anyone know the reason why X-Rite is using different tolerances
in the i1Profiler Printer QA? The max avg dE is 5 and the primary hue dE is
1.5 when verify using the X-Rite SWOP or GRACoL data sets. Competiing proof
verification products use max avg dE of 6 and primary hue dE of 2.5. I
believe max avg dE 6 and primary hue dE of 2.5 is the official published
values of ISO 12647-7:2007. Maybe X-Rite is using proposed or draft
tolerances?
Can't edit the tolerances in the X-Rite's i1Profiler .ini file.
--
Dan Reid
RPimaging, INC
Color Communication Experts
http://www.rpimaging.com _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden