Re: Fwd: Monitor calibration/profiling for video applications
Re: Fwd: Monitor calibration/profiling for video applications
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Monitor calibration/profiling for video applications
- From: Nipat Paiboonponpong <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
>One of the advantages having a single specific target in mind has is that
>some fine tuning can be applied over the whole system, whereas the normal
>ICC approach puts up with any slight errors introduced in the separate
>characterisation of the input and output devices and the linking process.
>> display. It would seem much more sensible to me for the video industry to move to an ICC-profile
>> type setup where recording devices are profiled (perhaps less important because of post
>> processing), displays are profiled and each video (however processed for effect) comes with a
>> profile that aids a CMM to deliver the correct look on any display.
>Ideally, but I can very well understand this approach not being practical in the real
>world at present. The ICC approach has struggled (and still struggles) to work in a
>practical sense of profiles and systems being available, whereas fixed standards such
>as sRGB and the typical Video industry approach around Rec. 709 etc. are relatively
>simple and practical. They do straight jacket technical development though, resulting
>in great struggles when things like wider gamut displays or higher dynamic range are
>introduced.
Very well said, I always think the failure of ICC workflow implementation
in the industry in general comes from the lack of solid guidance/measure
to match its confusion created by its flexibility and openness.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden