Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
- Subject: Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
- From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:50:59 -0700
On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Terence Wyse <email@hidden> wrote:
> To keep this conversation productive, I think the various parties should first define their application of "colorimetric matching" or "accuracy" in the context of art repro or general photography.
My point has been and continues to be that I do the whole empirical bit in the studio with great results, and that, when I use the exact same process out in the field but without dragging along my i1 Pro and laptop to close the verification loop, I have every appearance of everything working exactly the same way.
That may not be precise enough for peer-reviewed academia, but it's more than precise enough for me.
I'm still not entirely sure why there are those who seem to expect that a process that creates an acceptably accurate reproduction of arbitrary works of art in the studio would go completely wonky outside of the studio photographing the same things the artists paint, but that's not my personal problem.
Cheers,
b&
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden