Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
- Subject: Re: Colorimetric Accuracy in the Field
- From: Terence Wyse <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:32:33 -0400
On Jun 6, 2013, at 2:22 AM, Graeme Gill <email@hidden> wrote:
> Yes, but that's not the point. The point is how you get to a perceptual pleasing
> result. Just because the end result isn't colorimetric, doesn't mean that it's
> a good idea to skip colorimetric as a first step.
That's not what I'm saying.....and I agree with you.
My point was that there's maybe two factions, the "reproductionists" and the "artists" that are maybe talking past each other. I personally want accuracy (colorimetric) first....and at least with art reproduction, I pretty much know exactly how to determine that....but as soon as I stick my camera out a window, I've no clue how to determine accuracy in any meaningful or practical way.
Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden