Re: icc profile question..
Re: icc profile question..
- Subject: Re: icc profile question..
- From: Tyler Boley <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:38:16 -0700
but the B to A tables, used for actual printing and converting, remain
large. What am I missing?
Tyler
Terence Wyse wrote:
On Mar 25, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Tyler Boley<email@hidden> wrote:
So my build settings that effect size make the difference.. two questions-
What drawback can there be to making the smallest A to B tables? I can't soft proof with these profiles anyway.
Accuracy will suffer with fewer grid points/smaller tables. I've tested this.....table size seems to have a great impact than the number of patches used to build the profile.
What drawback can there be to excluding cxf data in the profile? I have all data relevant to the build saved elsewhere.
As long as you've saved the measurement data as an .mxf file within i1Profiler, shouldn't be a problem to exclude the cxf data.
Regards,
Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden