Re: Generating X-Rite DNG camera profiles for LR. Did I miss something?
Re: Generating X-Rite DNG camera profiles for LR. Did I miss something?
- Subject: Re: Generating X-Rite DNG camera profiles for LR. Did I miss something?
- From: LdaSignup <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 21:40:33 -0600
- Importance: Normal
However, which is more stable, PSD, or TIFF?
To me, TIFF ... because:
* it's more likely to be supported for the duration of your grand-children's
children's lifetime.
* if you ever get into the position of changing pp tools away from Adobe,
TIFF's are much more likely to be supported.
* If Adobe ceases to exist, or decides to abandon support of PSD's, a TIFF
is still likely to be supported.
* My understanding is that PSD's are more complicated than TIFF's, in that a
PSD is something of a "wrapper" of a tiff (as are many if not most RAW
files). The PSD may be smaller than a TIFF, but my speculation is that would
be because it uses a different compression algorithm. Typically, complexity
== less stable.
Regarding vulnerability to file corruption ... that's typically
proportionally related to file size. So I suppose a smaller PSD would have a
smaller risk of file corruption. Or not?
Also, "consider the source" ... others on this list may inform both of us
about "the error of my ways".
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden