Re: B+W 77mm UV/IR Cut (486M) MRC Filter
Re: B+W 77mm UV/IR Cut (486M) MRC Filter
- Subject: Re: B+W 77mm UV/IR Cut (486M) MRC Filter
- From: John Castronovo <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 13:07:14 -0400
- Importance: Normal
True enough about the age of the article, but I didn't think that sensor
filtration changed that much. It would be nice and I stand corrected if
that's the case, but I think that sensors are still very sensitive to IR
unless filtered and good IR filters aren't transparent. I think that losing
of an extra stop or more of sensitivity to cure IR problems that only show
up with certain problematic copy work is something camera manufacturers
aren't likely to do.
-----Original Message-----
From: Iliah Borg
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 12:36 PM
To: John Castronovo
Subject: Re: B+W 77mm UV/IR Cut (486M) MRC Filter
Dear John,
Robin Meyers did some experiments for Betterlight and wrote a great paper
describing this issue of IR in digitally reproducing problematic fine art:
http://www.betterlight.com/downloads/whitePaper/wp_color_accurate_photo.pdf
This article is from 2000. We now at the rate of about 1 new camera with raw
capabilities per week. The filtration on the sensors and the sensor itself
changed dramatically.
--
Best regards,
Iliah Borg
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6359 - Release Date: 05/26/13
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden