Re: Epson Spectroproofer Pulse
Re: Epson Spectroproofer Pulse
- Subject: Re: Epson Spectroproofer Pulse
- From: Derek Lambert <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:55:18 -0400
Mike,
I am sorry. I should be more specific. I do not consider pulse technology to be worst than i1. Actually pulse was able to operate without being attached to any computer. I was only reffering to my own usage.
For me i1 pro or i1 pro 2 is much better than pulse as I can use it to scan charts automatically with io table. This is wat better than scan by hand even cordless. Of course there is iSis but with iO table you are not limited to thin media.
------
Sent from Apple touch-screen device
Best Regards,
Derek Lambert
> On Jun 26, 2014, at 2:44 PM, G Mike Adams <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Derek,
>
> As an old time Pulse user who much preferred it back in the day to the old i1, who did several tests between my old Pulses and i1s and found their readings to be pretty much identical, and who was very disappointed also back in the day to see X-Rite drop the Pulse in favor of what I personally considered to be the much inferior i1, and who was finally very glad to see some of the much-missed features of the Pulse incorporated into the new i1 device...
>
> I'm curious in just what way you consider the Pulse is "inferior."
>
>
> Mike Adams
> Correct Color
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden