Re: In search of a D50 Editing colorspace
Re: In search of a D50 Editing colorspace
- Subject: Re: In search of a D50 Editing colorspace
- From: Lars Borg <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:35:47 +0000
- Thread-topic: In search of a D50 Editing colorspace
It seems we agree.
The ICC profile would map R=G=B=255 => X=96.42 Y=100 Z=82.49 regardless of
the display's white point.
I don't see any quantization errors here.
And, as you say, the display would map R=G=B=255 to its white point.
It's just convenient to sometimes have a D65 label matching the device.
Lars
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:25 AM
To: Lars <email@hidden>
Cc: 'Colorsync List' <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: In search of a D50 Editing colorspace
>On Sep 3, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Lars Borg <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> In principle yes, but some users want to believe they're working in D65,
>> so the D65 label needs to be there, even if it doesn't actually do
>> anything for them.:-)
>
>I'm trying to think of a practical reason other than perhaps quantization
>errors in certain circumstances why it would make a difference.
>Regardless of whether R=G=B=255 => X=96 Y=100 Z=83 or X=95 Y=100 Z=109,
>it's still going to get mapped to your display's white point when
>viewing. Same thing with gamma; it affects encoding, but it shouldn't
>ever affect display.
>
>b&
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden