• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
profiling iMac Retina displays running OS X 10.10
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

profiling iMac Retina displays running OS X 10.10


  • Subject: profiling iMac Retina displays running OS X 10.10
  • From: Bruce Bumbarger <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:40:52 -0500

Hello:
I've been trying to profile two new iMac Retinas using an i1Display Pro and
software. Both have the desktop set to medium gray.

Using the advanced mode, I set the display type to White LED, the white
point to D65, the luminance to 100cd/m2. Following advice found on
www.imagescience.com.au, I've set the contrast ratio to 250:1 rather than
native as I'd like the two displays to match as closely as possible. I use
the default profile settings except that I change the profile version from
4 to 2. I choose the largest patch set. I choose to adjust brightness and
contrast rather than using the ADC option and am able to adjust to 99 or
100 cd/m2, although it's not always the same on both monitors. After
running through the measurement process, on my latest attempt I get white
point results of 6506, luminance of 99 cd/m2 and contrast ratio of 278:1 on
one display and 6522, 100cd/m2 and 275:1 on the other.

Is this about as close as I'll get? It seems pretty consistent to me, but
visually one display looks to be a more neutral gray while the other seems
"warmer" and appears to have a slight magenta cast. I've tried profiling
with different white point settings, but the mismatch seems to occur
regardless of the choice I make. More than one viewer has the same
impression. Can I expect to get the screens to match? I don't have a sense
whether the difference in the results I get is large enough to account for
the visual differences one sees.

When I make a sample print and view it under the lighting we use I get what
I consider to be a good match between the screen and print - it actually
looks pretty consistent on both screens. However, the computers are in a
lab space used by students and the question does come up as to why the
screens don't match. I'd appreciate whatever advice/information that anyone
can offer.

Bruce

--
Bruce Bumbarger
Library Conservator
Magill Library - Haverford College
370 Lancaster Avenue
Haverford, PA 19041
610-896-1165
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: profiling iMac Retina displays running OS X 10.10
      • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
    • Re: profiling iMac Retina displays running OS X 10.10
      • From: Spinnaker Photo Imaging Center <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Fwd: Store lighting suggestion?
  • Next by Date: white reflectance calibration strip: flatbed scanners
  • Previous by thread: BridgeCC & PhotoshopCC 2014: Grayscale images displaying differently.
  • Next by thread: Re: profiling iMac Retina displays running OS X 10.10
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread