• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black)


  • Subject: Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black)
  • From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:13:31 -0800

> On Jan 8, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Jorge . <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> that the resulting separations (by converting with Photoshop using Colorimetric Relative w/BPC) are rendered (in Photoshop, again) so differently than when these same separations are rendered as ISOcoated_v2_eci.icc

Quick question:

How much do the separations differ when both are done without BPC?

Don’t forget, BPC scales between the dynamic range of the input and output profiles. A CMYK profile built without K will have less dynamic range and will separate differently….

I’m not saying that w/o BPC is the desired result, but I’m curious nonetheless.

regards,

Steve



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black) (From: "Jorge ." <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black) (From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black) (From: "Jorge ." <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: entire email word wrapped
  • Next by Date: Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black)
  • Previous by thread: Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black)
  • Next by thread: Re: FOGRA39 CMY-only profile (no black)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread