• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: "Pantone Process" Inks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Pantone Process" Inks


  • Subject: Re: "Pantone Process" Inks
  • From: Michael Eddington <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:18:05 -0500

Your interpretation is correct…Pantone CMYK primaries are governed under
ISO 2846-1.

http://www.pantone.com/help/?t=CMYK-Primaries-not-found-in-PANTONE-FORMULA-GUIDE-and-PANTONE-SOLID-CHIPS

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Todd Shirley <email@hidden>
wrote:

> Hello everybody
>
> This isn’t exactly color management but I’m hoping one of you has
> experience with this topic.
>
> What exactly is the difference between Pantone Process Inks (PANTONE
> Process Cyan, PANTONE Process Megenta, PANTONE Process Yellow, PANTONE
> Process Black) and "standard" CMYK process inks? I work with a designer who
> insists her work should be printed with Pantone Process inks, not "Standard
> CMYK". She is under the impression that Pantone Process inks will produce a
> wider gamut or will reporoduce "better" in some way. I have always believed
> that a CMYK image will look the same with either "kind" of inks because in
> fact there is no difference.
>
> I had actually made this inquiry of Pantone a couple years ago, and they
> supported my position that there isn't any such thing as "pantone process
> inks" and that the shading for all CMYK primaries is governed under ISO
> 2846-1. However, not only does the designer persist in her belief that
> these are different inks, she has 2 different printers and another vendor
> who agree with her and insist that printing with "pantone process" produces
> better results than standard CMYK. One of the printers said they mix their
> own "pantone process inks." Is this really a thing? Is it perhaps just a
> higher quality ink? Does anybody know what they are talking about?
>
> I had settled this in my mind years ago, but just recently was in a
> meeting with the above client, vendors and printers and was somewhat
> angrily rebuffed when I dismissed “pantone process” out of hand. So maybe
> I’m the crazy one. If so, please correct me!
>
> Thanks
>
> -Todd Shirley
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Turn off color management! (From: Kai-Uwe Behrmann <email@hidden>)
 >"Pantone Process" Inks (From: Todd Shirley <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: "Pantone Process" Inks
  • Next by Date: Re: Turn off color management!
  • Previous by thread: Re: "Pantone Process" Inks
  • Next by thread: Mundane color problem
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread