Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 76
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 76
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 76
- From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:43:00 -0700
On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Denis Potapenko <email@hidden> wrote:
>> ...you're again limited (at least in practice, if not theory) to 24-patch original ColorChecker targets with no ability to supply custom measurements.
>
> please finally read the dcamprof manual !!!
DCamProf is not an Adobe product. And it's only about a year old.
Yes, Anders is to be highly commended for his work, and I'd unhesitatingly recommend DCamProf for those stuck using DNG profiles in their workflow. But I wouldn't for a moment recommend using Camera Raw or Lightroom for a colorimetric workflow, and I'd strongly caution against DNG-based workflows in general -- if for no other reason than that everything else (monitor, printer, proofing, what-not) is ICC-based rather than DNG-based. DNG doesn't give you anything over ICC for colorimetric reproduction, so why mess with it at all?
b&
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 76 (From: Chris Cox <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 76 (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 76 (From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 76 (From: Iliah Borg <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 76 (From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>) |