• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream?


  • Subject: Re: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream?
  • From: Ben Goren <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:31:26 -0700

On Mar 25, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Roger Breton <email@hidden> wrote:

> How would reading the emitted colors from this type of display be any more difficult for a spectral device than any other kinds of displays?

A spectrometer should work fine. A colorimeter would almost certainly need a new calibration matrix, which could be created with a spectrometer. See, for example, ArgylCMS's ccmxmake.

Cheers,

b&
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >RE: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream? (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream? (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream?
  • Next by Date: Re: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream?
  • Previous by thread: RE: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream?
  • Next by thread: Re: Quantum Dot Tech - cheap wide gamut but is it ready for mainstream?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread