Re: gamma bewilderment wrt/ Argyll’s documentation
Re: gamma bewilderment wrt/ Argyll’s documentation
- Subject: Re: gamma bewilderment wrt/ Argyll’s documentation
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:15:10 -0600
- Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Ben Goren <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> A lot of displays / graphic cards on the market are still bragging about having 10-bit internal LUTs, which tells me that there're still lots with 8-bit LUTs -- and even ten bits could still be problematic if you're not handling it well. So it wouldn't matter much how your data is encoded on disk if it's getting quantized down at the display.
No visible banding on-screen here with a PA272W, high bit files. But if there were, I'd know it's in the preview, not the image data (if working high bit which I always do). The banding would be an issue if the final output were on a display that did show banding of course. That the banding is visible on the display but not in the image data is useful if the output isn't going to a device that produces banding on it's own.
Not sure what you mean by: even ten bits could still be problematic if you're not handling it well.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden