Re: 44" low-volume photo inkjet printer?
Re: 44" low-volume photo inkjet printer?
- Subject: Re: 44" low-volume photo inkjet printer?
- From: "email@hidden" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:56:35 -0400
I second what Marin Orpen says. Infrequent use with a 99 can be more expensive than getting it printed by a professional fine-art lab.
Best,
Walker
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 4:36 PM, Martin Orpen <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>> On 13 Sep 2016, at 19:39, Ben Goren <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I pretty much just need 44", photo quality, and not likely to die or otherwise eat me alive in maintenance and repairs.
>
>
> Ben
>
> I choose to use Epson 9900s but I wouldn’t recommend them for low volume work.
>
> Our 9900s (like the 9880s before them) will do 3yrs of service, thousands upon thousands of contract proofs and then retire to give even more years of service to others.
>
> The heads aren’t consumables like they are on the Canon ink jets so replacement isn’t routine.
>
> I can only recall having two print heads replaced in 15 years of contract proofing.
>
> The harder you drive the the more reliable they are. Leave them idle and they are nothing but trouble :(
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Martin Orpen
> Idea Digital Imaging Ltd _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden