Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 11
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 11
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 11
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:15:26 +1100
Axel Robert wrote:
> I’m trying to answer according what I already read about the V4 ICC profiles. This is
> related to the ICC White paper#2 March 2014: using the sRGB_ICC_v4_appearance.icc
> profile and White Paper #26 Using the sRGB_v4_ICC_preference.icc profile.
>
> They both indicate a better use of rendering intents when comes the time to separate
> from RGB to CMYK and a more precise definition of the PCS.
There have been various attempts to show the potential of using the PRMG, but:
1) There's nothing to stop someone using the PRMG in a V2 profile. Indeed,
some existing V2 profilers may have been doing something quite similar,
and maybe the PRMG was an attempt to formalize this approach.
2) You can get even better gamut mapping results by creating a gamut
mapping for a specific source profile -> destination profile combination,
avoiding any intermediate Gamut. This doesn't require V4.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden