Re: FOGRA52 & i1Profiler [subject corrected]
Re: FOGRA52 & i1Profiler [subject corrected]
- Subject: Re: FOGRA52 & i1Profiler [subject corrected]
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 21:39:15 +0100
> On 8 Sep 2017, at 20:31, Roger Breton <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> How's the Perceptual Intent?
Smooth, but the blacks still don’t match.
And, as the aim here is to generate profiles for black & white or critical
neutral reproduction in CMYK, we don’t really need any proprietary perceptual
voodoo.
We need blacks that match.
>> It’s ridiculous having a *standard* that requires massive editing before
>> repro houses can create an ICC profile that matches the generic profiles
>> published by the ECI.
>
> Doesn't the ECI site offers some kind of "standard" Fogra52 ICC profile?
> I suppose you long tried that option.
Yep, and that’s where the problem is.
PSO Uncoated and whatever number of variants you want to produce yourself from
the 47 data yield images that match *fairly* well.
PSO Uncoated v3 and your custom ICC profiles made from the 52 data yield images
that don’t match.
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden