PSO Coated v3 separations
PSO Coated v3 separations
- Subject: PSO Coated v3 separations
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 22:49:33 +0100
Is it just me that thinks that FOGRA51 produces inferior separations and
unacceptable skin colour?
Just like FOGRA52 we get separations that lack yellow when we need MORE yellow
to create an acceptable skin colour.
Who makes the decisions about colour reproduction for these standards?
Have they proofed and printed the BVDM Roman 16 images with the Green and Blue
backgrounds?
Did they honestly believe that skin the colour of boiled ham was acceptable?
This causes a lot of problems in pre-press workflows because clients supplying
Photoshop CMYK end up with terrible looking images and any that we edit using
commercial separation software (that corrects the yellow deficiency) look
nothing like the images in the rest of the job.
This wasn’t the case with FOGRA39.
The new standards are producing substandard results :(
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden