Proofing stock
Proofing stock
- Subject: Proofing stock
- From: Mike Strickler <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:44:00 -0800
Not necessary. When you convert to the printer space using absolute
colorimetric rendering the a darker, yellower paper color of SWOP3 will be
simulated. When there is the possibility that a range of print conditions will
need to be simulated, it is convenient to choose a proofing paper that is
comparable to or brighter than the brightest press substrate likely to be used
as the target. A bit of extra bluishness is good as well, as simulating warmer
papers uses mostly yellow ink, which doesn’t darken the print much. The same is
untrue of simulating bluish, brightened stocks, with the result that the result
may be noticeably too dark. In my view, GRACo2006-matched papers have neither
the brightness nor bluishness to be versatile enough for most commercial shops.
Mike Strickler
MSP Graphic Services
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:19:49 -0600
> From: Mark Franzen <email@hidden>
> To: email@hidden
> Subject: Proofing stock
> Message-ID:
> <CAHD50Hmc+vhj2vdTrT0mv=email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>
> Hello -
>
> I am looking for some advice. I am doing some proofing for a client, and
> originally was going to cross render to GRACoL coated so I ordered and
> profiled *Epson **Standard Proofing Paper (240)* for my printer.
>
> Now the client would like to go to SWOP 3 (after consulting with their
> print house).
>
> Should I order some Epson *Standard Proofing Paper SWOP3* or can I stick
> with the first paper (GRACoL) and cross render to SWOP 3 instead of GRACoL?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mark Franzen
> email@hidden
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden