Re: imageRunner 5535i vs Phaser 7800GX
Re: imageRunner 5535i vs Phaser 7800GX
- Subject: Re: imageRunner 5535i vs Phaser 7800GX
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 16:53:03 +1000
email@hidden wrote:
> The only problem with all three "photocopiers" / printers I tested, at the
> time,
> Minolta, Canon and Xerox, was the inability to maintain the calibration over
> time: as
> soon as I changed substrate, going from outputting on Fortune Gloss 60 Lbs
> 13x19 to
> regular Bond paper Tabloid, the delta Es degraded quite a bit, from 1.85
> deltaE to
> upwards of 3 to 4, and I had to reprofile to get back to 1.85ish.
That is typically why there would be a calibration function. i.e. much quicker
to re-calibrate than re-profile. [Our ColorBus RIPs had an off the glass
calibration
function specifically for this purpose, and used quite successfully for
Newspaper
proofing. Long gone now of course :-( ]
Cheers,
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden