Re: Xrite i1Pro3+ review
Re: Xrite i1Pro3+ review
- Subject: Re: Xrite i1Pro3+ review
- From: Scott Martin via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:47:22 -0500
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, email@hidden wrote:
> I still have an old SpectrascanT table, here, but I never used it for that
> purpose.
The T table! I keep a “PurpleLino” around for quite a while. I’ve enjoyed using
Barbieri's for transmissive measurement as well but the workflow has always
been a bit of a science project. The i1Pro3+ really bring its together for me
with a relatively quick and easy process with results that are aligned nicely
with what we're used to seeing from reflective processes.
Once RIPs integrate XRIte’s i1Pro3+ API’s into their software, polarized
measuremnts will really be an easy slam dunk.
> The two gamuts you present at the beginning of the article are interesting
> and show that the "absolute" size (volume) of the gamut is less important
> than its "relative" size.
Yes, the general public needs to get a little smarter about not coming to false
conclusions from these renderings, and especially from polarized measurements.
It’s so important to make prints and study those both visually and
colorimetricially before coming to any conclusions. Hopefully this sheds a
little light on that.
Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com
Precise color science for printmaking professionals
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden