• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)


  • Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • From: Wire ~ via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:48:51 -0800

Yes, MonacoEZColor! That's it

So what made a world-renowned color company think they could offer consumer
inkjet printer profiling this way?

And it worked for me well enough to allow custom ink and paper combos that
looks way better than default, even if they might be imperfect by all kinds
of measures.

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:38 PM Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <
email@hidden> wrote:

>
>
> > On Jan 10, 2020, at 3:27 PM, Wire ~ via colorsync-users <
> email@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Per this "where does the gamut not live" convo...
>
> Must you?
>
> > Back in the bronze age of consumer color I had a Monaco package that made
> > printer and scanner profiles.
>
> MonacoEZ? Whatever, scanner based printer profiles?  No, it didn’t work
> worth a damn making printer profiles.
> Back in days even before that, at least there were actual tools like the
> ColorTron (still have one) that could.
>
> > Why can an unprofiled scanner be used to make a printer profile,
>
> No.
>
> > yet it's common to create and use a IT8- ot Q60-referenced scanner
> profile for photographic scans?
>
> What makes you assume an un-profiled scanner can make a printer profile
> that’s useable? Have you ever tried to make a decent paper profile with a
> scanner as some here have?
> Tried the same thing with a recent version of SliverFast? I have, also a
> printer profile created. Useless but created.
>
> Do you own a Spectrophotometer? Want a printer profile, use that; right
> tool for the right job.
>
> Andrew Rodney
> http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
      • From: Wire ~ via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: perceptual differences in Lab deltaE (From: Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: WAYNE BRETL via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Iliah Borg via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Iliah Borg via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: edmund ronald via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Roger Breton via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: WAYNE BRETL via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Graeme Gill via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: WAYNE BRETL via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Iliah Borg via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Florian Höch via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Graeme Gill via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Wire ~ via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Dell UP2516D
  • Next by Date: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Next by thread: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread