• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)


  • Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • From: Graeme Gill via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:47:02 +1100

Martin Orpen via colorsync-users wrote:

> How can you profile it?

Like any other output device!

> We have coatings that are only visible to humans under specific illuminants,
> coatings
> that change colour dependent on temperature, coatings that fluoresce,
> coatings that are
> magnetic etc etc.

As you well know, you need special instruments to characterize
optical properties other than color. If you load a printer up with
inks that have such special characteristics, then using
conventional color measurement is unlikely to be a good
characterization of its appearance or other physical characteristics.
So this is all irrelevant to the discussion, since it strays outside
the realm of spectral characteristics and color.

> If I can run any known coating to any known substrate then the output device
> would
> become as difficult to profile as an input device wouldn’t it?

No, it would be more difficult. An input device can be characterized
measuring its spectral sensitivity.

Cheers,
        Graeme Gill.
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Rich Wagner via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Graeme Gill via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Martin Orpen via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Graeme Gill via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?) (From: Martin Orpen via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Next by Date: RE: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Next by thread: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread