Re: i1Pro3 review
Re: i1Pro3 review
- Subject: Re: i1Pro3 review
- From: Scott Martin via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 16:15:27 +0000
So, just to be clear, there’s the i1Pro3plus “large aperture” device and the
i1Pro3 “standard aperture” device. Prepare for people to mistakenly refer to
one or the other.
I have the i1iO3 table and it looks just like the latest black i1iO2 table. The
internal arm mechanism has been re-engineered with more precise and longer
laster metal parts. The scanning area is the same size. I hear you - I imagined
a huge table myself.
The i1Pro3 is capable of even smaller patches than the i1Pro2. While the
recommend patch size is 7x7mm, can you crank that down to 6x6mm.
Scott Martin
www.on-sight.com
Precise color science for printmaking professionals
> On Jan 31, 2020, at 4:08 PM, Roger Breton via colorsync-users
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Good show, Scott. One silly question, if I may, since the i1Pro3 aperture is
> larger, and charts need to account for that fact, did X-Rite have to the
> increase the size of the iO Table?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >RE: i1Pro3 review (From: Roger Breton via colorsync-users <email@hidden>) |