• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Lab -> RGB
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lab -> RGB


  • Subject: Re: Lab -> RGB
  • From: Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 19:09:46 -0600

IF everything is color managed, Adobe RGB (1998) is fine. If it isn’t color
managed, it will still look reasonably good on a wide gamut display, awful on
an sRGB gamut display. The opposite is seen with sRGB (OK on sRGB gamut
display, not on wide gamut display).
So if again, everything is color managed (the image data and browser) AND your
audience is using wide gamut displays, you gain nothing with sRGB and a bit
wider gamut from the original in Adobe RGB (1998). Or DCI-P3 (6 of one, half
dozen of the other).

Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/

> On May 6, 2020, at 6:58 PM, Jeff Nova via colorsync-users
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> My userbase commonly has full Adobe RGB coverage monitors - creative
> professionals. So maybe that’s the choice? - J

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Lab -> RGB
      • From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
References: 
 >RE: Lab -> RGB (From: Roger Breton via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Lab -> RGB (From: Jeff Nova via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: Lab -> RGB
  • Next by Date: Re: Lab -> RGB
  • Previous by thread: Re: Lab -> RGB
  • Next by thread: Re: Lab -> RGB
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread