• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Scanner Profiling Issue
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scanner Profiling Issue


  • Subject: Re: Scanner Profiling Issue
  • From: John Castronovo via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:13:36 -0400
  • Importance: Normal

An embedded profile cannot change the values. They are what they are unless a profile interprets them differently. What you need to be concerned about is the stability of the scans. If they vary depending upon content or for any other reason, you can't profile that scanner. The other thing that could be raising your numbers is optical flare and that will certainly cause issues. Make sure everything in the optical path is clean.

John C.
Techphoto, llc

-----Original Message----- From: Chase via colorsync-users
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 6:58 PM
To: email@hidden ; Pat Herold Chromix
Subject: Scanner Profiling Issue

Hi,
I've been trained to profile digital devices by (after calibration) first turning off all color management meaning no profile application to the output, making a "raw" output and opening it in a profiling application to make an ICC input profile. I'm running into a problem trying to profile a scanner whose software interface will not allow you to turn off the color management on any scan. I was told by the manufacturer to just discard the embedded profile (in Photoshop) prior to creating and opening the now supposed "raw" scan used to make a profile in Xrite or other applications. When tested in Photoshop, the supplied initial embedded profile supplied and recommended to use during profiling by the manufacturer raised all the "L" values about seven "L" so it did change the "raw" values of the scanner for every scan. To my mind, if a "raw" scan is not truly "raw," it will not profile correctly. Testing the resulting new input profile had problems with tone values, gray and color hues. Therefore, their assumption of just discarding a profile in Photoshop will not create a truly "raw scan?" I have not seen it. Any ideas? Is there any way I can traditionally profile this type of scanner? That is the problem I am trying to solve.
Thanks for your opinion,
Randy ZauchaManaged Color
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Scanner Profiling Issue
      • From: Jon Meyer via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Scanner Profiling Issue (From: Chase via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: IS&T CIC28 to move Online—Extended Submission Deadlines & More
  • Next by Date: Re: Scanner Profiling Issue
  • Previous by thread: Scanner Profiling Issue
  • Next by thread: Re: Scanner Profiling Issue
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread