Re: Workflow for ‘remote’ profiling a non-colormanaged printer as a ‘back-box’
Re: Workflow for ‘remote’ profiling a non-colormanaged printer as a ‘back-box’
- Subject: Re: Workflow for ‘remote’ profiling a non-colormanaged printer as a ‘back-box’
- From: Jon Meyer via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:31:38 -0400
Andrew’s weekly audit is a scientific approach to validating print condition
consistency.
Fail the audit? Forget remote profiling.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 15, 2021, at 12:39 PM, Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 15, 2021, at 10:33 AM, Henry Davis via colorsync-users
>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I understand and agree about a moving target but there are other moving
>> parts such as the person driving the file. The same person drives the
>> targets for a month and it’s stable. The job is sent and a different person
>> drives that file differently - kaput.
>>
>
>
> Even a broken clock is right, twice a day.
>
> A process, a print process is either consistent based on measured data or it
> isn’t. That’s all we remote profilers have to worry about before even
> thinking of profiling remotely.
>
> Andrew Rodney
> http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden