Re: OT: alias options in gcc?
Re: OT: alias options in gcc?
- Subject: Re: OT: alias options in gcc?
- From: Bill Stewart <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:41:51 -0800
I was being facetious (should have used quotes:) - but your description
is indeed the case - there is a noinline keyword (I think that's what
its called) that can be used to make sure that the compiler doesn't
inline these sensitive methods
Bill
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 12:35 PM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
on 11/26/02 12:01 PM, Bill Stewart <email@hidden> wrote:
the thing we most get bitten by here is
the proclivity of the compiler to inline code with O3 and small stub
routines that have altivec code ending up executing on a G3
Do you really mean "executing"? It doesn't make sense to me that
inlining
would change what code gets executed. It seems conceivable that
inlining
might cause altivec code to be included in a function intended to be
non-altivec only.
-Kurt Bigler
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
--
mailto:email@hidden
tel: +1 408 974 4056
________________________________________________________________________
__
"Much human ingenuity has gone into finding the ultimate Before.
The current state of knowledge can be summarized thus:
In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded" - Terry Pratchett
________________________________________________________________________
__
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.