• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: 'Ganged' or 'Linked' Hardware
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 'Ganged' or 'Linked' Hardware


  • Subject: Re: 'Ganged' or 'Linked' Hardware
  • From: Andrew Kimpton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:41:07 -0700

Jeff Moore wrote:

I think that BJ summed things up quite well.

The philosophy of the HAL/IOAudio family is to do as little processing in the driver as possible and to rely on the application to do all the heavy lifting, especially when it comes to synchronizing multiple devices. As BJ points out, this is really the only way to handle the general case where an app wants to synchronize Device A from Manufacturer B with Device X from Manufacturer Y.


This is not something I've really dived into in detail yet - but I have to wonder: Is it really feasible to expect the application to either take care of or more critically guide the user through the steps required to ensure accurate sync between two disparate pieces of hardware from different vendors.

For example many Macintosh's have built in audio hardware that can capture audio, more serious users choose to augment this either with USB based devices (even cheap ones like iMic, or more expensive devices such as those from Edirol), some users choose to spend more money and acquire hardware such as Metric Halo's or M-Audio's. The more expensive devices often support an external clock source and some may provide an external clock, the cheaper devices often don't, and the Apple built-in hardware certainly doesn't.

So some devices are better candidates for working together than other's. If applications are to have any chance of maintaining quality playback and recording what are the mechanisms for determining that a list of devices are 'compatible' with each other and have linked clock sources ? How do I prevent a user from attempting to acquire two channels of audio through the built in hardware, two channels through and iMic and 8 more through a MobileIO ? This combination seems most unlikely to be able to deliver a quality result which will result in customer support and satisfaction problems.

Andrew 8-)
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: 'Ganged' or 'Linked' Hardware
      • From: Jeff Moore <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: 'Ganged' or 'Linked' Hardware (From: Jeff Moore <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: 'Ganged' or 'Linked' Hardware
  • Next by Date: Re: CoreAudio and JDK 1.4
  • Previous by thread: Re: 'Ganged' or 'Linked' Hardware
  • Next by thread: Re: 'Ganged' or 'Linked' Hardware
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread