• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: The Plugin Settings Approach.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Plugin Settings Approach.


  • Subject: Re: The Plugin Settings Approach.
  • From: Marc Poirier <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:12:12 +0100 (CET)

On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Jay Vaughan wrote:

> My approach attempts to make it *easier* for the musician to use
> their plugins, across multiple apps and across multiple computes.
> The existing approach requires an "import/export" stage for the muso,
> and also has the problem that plugin settings are not safely stored
> individually, nor are they transportable across apps, easily.

Yeah, I see that that is an issue... (more below)

> In fact, there's a 3):
>
> 3) Make all plugin settings easy to back up, and support the
> "~/Documents" design guide which Apple would like everyone to use,
> I'm sure (it makes for easy backups, user admin, etc).

Yes, easy to back up, but when you actaully want to look in that folder...
(see below)

> >Solving #1 with a chunk (sorry for the VST terminology) in the song
> >file is a fine solution.
>
> Until you want to use that preset setting elsewhere, in which case
> you have to remember which song file it was in and do an
> 'export/import' step. Blagh!
>
> Seems to me you're the one not thinking like a muso!! :) (No offense intended)

Well, as the muso part of me speaking, I find this solution a little bit
like using a blowtorch to light a candle. In my songs, I use tons of
plugins, and I would say that probably less than 1% of the settings that I
come up are useful in any other context than the specific track of that
specific song. What I would be left with, using your approach, it a
folder full of thousands of settings with filenames using some obtuse hash
naming system and I would never be able to find the 0.6% of useful presets
in that overflowing folder! If I come up with some setting while working
on a song that I think is really generally useful, then I export a preset.
Then I name it something that I will remember, put it somewhere where I
will find it, and it's great. With your system, sure I would have all of
those presets already ready to go, but in a totally chaotic mile-high pile
of files that I'd need to spend ages searching through.

Please don't be offended by my disagreement, I respect your ideas and
definitely do recognize the problems that you're trying to address and
that they are real, but I think that your proposed solution would create
new problems that are worse than the ones that are being solved.



On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, B.J. Buchalter wrote:

> OK, but this does have a number of practical problems as well:
>
> 1) If the user copies the session file to another computer without
> copying the plug-in settings files, they cannot open the session
> properly (e.g. The session is not self contained).

Yes, I was thinking about this too. I see a potential tech support
nightmare brewing already... ;)

> 2) If the hash changes for some reason the link breaks -- any number of
> unexpected events could cause this to happen.
>
> 3) If you change the contents of the preset later, it will
> in-advertently change one or more sessions (silently). This is a huge
> problem. If this is avoided by having unique setting files for each
> session, the management of the settings becomes the users problems.

Yes yes, all very serious problems.

> Note that there is a fundamental difference between current state and
> named settings. Pro Tools gets this right. VST does not. IMHO,
> individual settings should be represented by one preset file (XML is
> file). "Banks" should be represented by directories containing preset
> files. If we want to bundle the directory so that it looks like a file
> to a casual user, that would be fine. Multiple "banks" should be
> available to the user at any given time in all hosts -- organized and
> browse-able hierarchically.

That all sounds nice to me, personally. :)


Marc
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: The Plugin Settings Approach. (From: Jay Vaughan <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: The Plugin Settings Approach.
  • Next by Date: Re: The Plugin Settings Approach.
  • Previous by thread: Re: The Plugin Settings Approach.
  • Next by thread: Re: The Plugin Settings Approach.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread